CHHS DEI Profile – Dr. Asha Thomas

Dr. Asha ThomasDr. Asha Thomas – School of Social Work

What is your role in your department/school?

I am the School Coordinator, Undergraduate and Graduate On-Campus advisor at the School of Social Work

What would you identify as one of the most significant actions you have taken to advance the cause for diversity either in the classroom, your community or your profession?

I believe that my strongest and salient contribution to diversity in my profession occurred when I, as a faculty member in a mid-western university, led a group of graduate students to study and work in India. Most of my graduate students participating in the program had not lived or worked in a developing nation.  The primary challenge for the participants was to negotiate cultural differences and barriers. The program also required them to do intense field work in community settings. During the earlier phases of the program, students relied on my help to interpret the complex and unfamiliar Indian culture. The discomfort and vulnerability created by the unfamiliar provided a golden opportunity for the group to reflect on complex issues related to race, LGBTQ rights, economic oppression, political participation etc. Students were able to discuss issues of social justice and marginalization within a comparative framework – India and the US.  I introduced both experiential learning and course-readings on LGBTQ rights, race and housing rights, and the fight for wage equality. Student have provided strong feedback about the inclusiveness of the program and the rich learnings about Indian culture, social structure and politics. In fact, this year I was asked to lead the program again.

How have you integrated topics of DEI into hiring new faculty and/or admitting students?

The School of Social work pays close and careful attention to topics of DEI in our admission process. Prospective applicants are introduced to our Transcultural Perspective during the admission’s informational session. Videos and other material on the TCP are available on the admissions page. Applicants are asked to reflect on various aspects of the TCP in their personal statement.

During the admission review process, the admission committee evaluates the applicants’ responses to the salient aspects of the TCP framework. The TCP emphasizes the importance of culture in social work at all levels of practice; understanding dynamics of power, privilege, and oppression; maintaining an awareness of one’s own cultural perspectives, values, and beliefs; and demonstrating respect in interactions within, among, and between systems. Specifically, the Committee reads for the applicant’s understanding and experiences with diversity and cultural humility in all areas pertaining to social work practice.

Tell us about how you and why you became attentive to DEI topics. What prompted this change in your department/school?  What did the process look like?

This is an interesting question because my response to this might sound cliched. I grew up in India—that sentence right there answers the how and why. The theoretical lens to understand issues of DEI came during my social work training in India (although we never quite used this term—at that time it was oppression and social justice). Our curriculum was strongly focused on Marxism and social justice. The ability to work on the topic during decades long practice with some of the most marginalized communities in India. The work was intense, hard and demanded considerable grit and patience. This led to a doctoral dissertation focused on social movements, the Indian state and tribal rights.

What support did you need to make it happen?  Did you draw on existing resources or examples that were helpful in guiding your change?

I have relied on the support of my colleagues and mentors in this work. Most of my experiences were based on a political rights /community approach to social work. In the US, particularly teaching social work was challenging, and the learning curve was steep. Here the focus is more on individual aspects of identity, and social work tends to focus on what we call micro or mezzo systems. In the School of Social Work, we have strong leadership and commitment to DEI related work.

Tell us one book, one article, one documentary, or once movie you’ve read or watched that you would like to suggest to others that helped shape your thinking about DEI work.

I am not sure if I can call it a DEI book, but a book that shaped my understanding of Civil Rights (and the fight for political inclusion) in the US is “Poor People’s Movements: Why they Succeed and How they Fail” by Piven and Cloward. This book helped me understand the immense potential of community action and organizing to bring about change. It is also a valuable account of the welfare rights movement in the US. Yet, it also cautions the social worker that real change is hard to win and sustain. Clearly, a valuable lesson for everyone that is working in the frontlines of DEI.

CHHS DEI Profile – Dr. Melisa Kaye

Dr. Melisa Kaye, Occupational TherapyDr. Melisa Kaye – Department of Occupational Therapy 

What is your role in your department/school?

I am an assistant professor in the Department of Occupational Therapy

What would you identify as one of the most significant actions you have taken to advance the cause for diversity either in the classroom, your community or your profession? 

I came out. To my colleagues, my clients, and now to my students. I realize that in 2022, an era where we can engage in entire programs of queer study at a university level, this may not seem like a revolutionary act. In the 70s however, coming out was an enormous political and personal decision. I was beaten up, harassed, and ostracized from family and community because I was a lesbian. LGBTQ people were publicly despised and discriminated against and basic freedoms were denied to us. As a new occupational therapist in the 90s, I realized LGBTQ folks were not represented in research or in practice– coming out was terrifying because the professional stakes were so high. I was especially reluctant to come out because I worked with children and was not sure how my client’s families or my colleagues would react.

I have no need or desire to tell everyone in my work world that I am queer, but I do not want to be forced to hide my identity either. As an aspect of holding healthy boundaries, I pragmatically reveal my sexual orientation and identity in the service of teaching and professional practice only. I do not want to proclaim, “I’m queer” to everyone I meet, yet in the context of my life and my job, it is important for me to stand up and assert my right to exist. This in turn means that I stand up for my LGBTQ colleagues, clients and students. By extension, it means that I demand, to the best of my ability, that LGBTQ people have the same protections, safety, opportunity, and justice as het and cis gender folks.

I understand that queer can be a hidden aspect of diversity, whereas race is often immediately evident to others. Being able to choose whether to come out affords me privilege. It also makes me prey to my own internalized homophobia. I understand and respect that privilege, so although being LGBTQ offers me certain insights into DEI work, I would not presume equate my experiences with sexual orientation with race, ethnicity, or other diversities. I think a source of power of the DEI work many of us are currently doing is the unity that builds through mutual respect of our differences and our common aims.

How have you integrated topics of DEI into hiring new faculty and/or admitting students?

Neither hiring nor student admission are included in my responsibilities right now because I am a relatively new faculty member. The area I have worked on and continue to address is honoring and integrating DEI into our curricula. I am committed to increasing the richness of my students’ experiences in my classes and to engendering cultural humility as these students prepare for entry level practice.

Tell us about how you and why you became attentive to DEI topics. What prompted this change in your department/school?  What did the process look like?

I have been steeped in issues surrounding justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion since I was a child. My mother was very active in the civil rights movement, as well as the women’s rights and disability rights movements. She was also deeply involved in worker’s rights and labor unionization. One of my first memories was being with my mom at an anti-war rally in Detroit, MI in the late 60s. We heard Angela Davis and Bobby Seale speak. I was so awed by what little I understood of the messages and also by the energy. Then, the police came in riot gear and started tear gassing the crowd. My mom was in a wheelchair and I climbed onto her lap so she could speed us through the square to get out of the gas. I was terrified and amazed, and I remember talking about it with her for a long, long time– it shaped a lot of the beliefs and perspectives I still hold today.

I, myself, have been politically active since I was a teenager. First in women’s rights and then in AIDS politics, LGBT rights, same sex marriage equality, and now as an ally in Black Lives Matter and DEI organizations. Being an occupational therapist, I am also a disability rights advocate and ally. I was active with ACT-UP and Queer Nation and then worked on the Prop 8 (same sex marriage legislation) campaign. I helped found a neighborhood political action organization in my community in 2016 after the presidential election. In sum, I have not changed who I am, I simply started integrating the work I was already doing in my communities into my roles at SJSU.

What support did you need to make it happen?  Did you draw on existing resources or examples that were helpful in guiding your change?

Perhaps the greatest influence on my decision to start doing DEI work at SJSU came from a process of de-compartmentalizing my life. In 2020 when I joined SJSU as tenure track faculty member, the world felt like it was going up in flames. We had just endured four years of a political regime that publicly sanctioned sexism, racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, ableism, and racially driven police brutality. Truth came under attack and became an easily assailable concept. COVID-19 was in full swing and our communities were in lockdown. I decided that for my own wellbeing, as well as that of my SJSU community, I wanted to do my part to be in the solution rather than succumbing to despair amidst all our many injustices and hardships.

As a means of recognizing my students’ experiences, I started by bringing current events to light in my classes. In my position, I am always conscious of not engaging in politics, yet for young adults who may never have experienced widespread injustice, it was vital to give voice to these historic issues. I remember when the spate of anti-Asian violence started and I knew I needed to acknowledge my students’ outrage and fear. I do not believe I can effectively teach if my students are not psychologically and emotionally available to learn, so the decision was driven by necessity.

I wanted to continue my work, so I applied for and was accepted to be an Affinity Mentor for Academic Success (AMAS). For the past year, I have shared my experience and worked with diverse students entering master’s programs at SJSU. I also joined CEED in Fall 2021, and got involved in DEI issues on a college level. Early on, I was introduced to the CEED needs assessment report to the college. The findings indicated that the formation of departmental DEI committees was a key action item. I brought this info back to my department, and our OT DEI committee was founded. Although we are in our infancy, the committee is up and running, which is fantastic. We balanced our membership between faculty/staff and students, and the students bring such vibrance and energy to the table. It’s an honor to be in conversation with colleagues and students, and to be working on these issues for my department, our college, SJSU, and my profession.

Tell us one book, one article, one documentary, or once movie you’ve read or watched that you would like to suggest to others that helped shape your thinking about DEI work. 

Ijeoma Oluo’s book So You Want to Talk About Race was a great book because it gave voice not only to deconstructing the myriad problems facing our country with regard to race, but also to actions that BIPOC people and white allies can take to effect change.

School of Social Work Expands MSW Student Opportunities for IPE

By: Ellen Ostergren, Destiny Santana, and Dr. Peter Allen Lee

Interprofessional Practice and Education or IPE is an emergent way of teaching and learning skills that prepare healthcare workers to be effective in teams.  As healthcare systems evolve to deliver care through teams, social workers’ roles and influence have expanded. The School of Social Work is part of this expansion, providing opportunities for Masters of Social Work (MSW) students to develop within an IPE framework and preparing them to work in dynamic health and mental health care teams where social workers contribute essential skills and perspectives among their colleagues who include physicians, nurses, occupational therapists, and physical therapists.

IPE is a unique way of developing the knowledge, skills, and values that health care workers need to problem-solve within an interdisciplinary team setting. According to de Saxe Zerden, IPE is founded on the premise that each team member has key expertise and a vital role in improving clients’ health outcomes. For instance, social workers serve as advocates for care, case managers and brokers of resources, and hands-on interventionists. IPE training programs provide social work students the opportunity to participate alongside peers in other health-related fields to problem-solve scenarios, learn effective communication, and plan care to meet the needs of diverse clients and patients. According to Jones and Phillips, IPE allows team members from other disciplines to understand the role of social workers, and social workers often become leaders in this type of team collaboration.

California Social Work Education CenterOne such IPE program is the San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) MSW Stipend Program led by the California Social Work Education Center (CalSWEC) and funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). According to CalSWEC, the program’s main goal is to build capacity and infrastructure for greater integration of behavioral health care and primary care services within communities in need. MSW students are taught specialized training that prepares them for effective behavioral health care services in integrated care settings. Upon graduation, students commit to seeking employment in IBH settings. The IBH program offers students participation in IPE with nursing, medical, and allied health students in the Bay Area.  Currently, our School of Social Work has six students in the IBH Program along with other final-year MSW students from the University of California at Berkeley, CSU East Bay, and San Francisco State University. MSW students earn a $10,000 stipend as they complete field hours, designated classes, and additional IPE educational activities. Among the key components, students engage in an intensive simulation experience provided by Samuel Merritt University and their simulation lab. The students receive hands-on experience collaborating with nursing and medical students in a simulated patient safety scenario, including practical application of TeamSTEPPS  (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety), an evidence-based set of teamwork tools developed to address communication and teamwork in health care settings. TeamSTEPPS is used at hospitals and healthcare settings across the county to enhance cooperative processes that impact all areas of care delivery.

It is exhilarating to see our students participate in IPE, gain real-world skills for communication and teamwork, and provide other learner-professionals a chance to collaborate with social workers who are vital members of any healthcare team. While IPE is a newer element in social work education and not yet integrated into most graduate-level coursework, it is aligned with the Council on Social Work Education’s competency-based education model and a natural fit for educators and clinicians alike. Our School of Social Work is excited about the opportunities IPE brings to our students and we are looking forward to even greater expansion of these efforts.

Cultivating a Culture of Inquiry: The Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program @ SJSU

By: Dr. Andrew Carter

Imagine being a graduating senior in line at a job fair with plans to plant the seeds for the first chapter in your career. With resume clutched in hand, you peruse the room to look at the other attendees, noticing their nervous energy as they similarly ponder what pathways their future might hold in store. While patiently waiting your turn to speak with recruiters, you begin reflecting on your college experience. It is at this point when you suddenly feel rushed over with a cataclysmic sense of FOMO – missed opportunities to engage more closely with faculty members, gain on-the-ground, applied experience in your areas of interest, and demystify the college experience and make clearer some of the hidden barriers.

Dr. Andrew Carter, Public Health and Recreation

Dr. Andrew Carter, Public Health and Recreation

Unfortunately, this scenario is all too common among college students in the U.S. Recent articles in Inside Higher Ed and the Washington Post highlighted larger trends in overall student  dissatisfaction with their college experience. Aligning with this trend, national college attrition rates have worsened over the last decade, due in part to lack of student engagement, unclear career goals, and difficulty with the transition process from secondary school.

Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP)

Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP)

Ample evidence suggests that introducing undergraduate students to research early in their college experience reduces attrition rates and limits instances of FOMO such as the one illustrated above. In an attempt to address these challenges directly, we launched the SJSU Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP) as a comprehensive retention strategy to enrich the academic experiences of our undergraduate students via engagement in research during their first and second years. The one year UROP curricular program features collaborative research opportunities between faculty and students, campus partnerships with peer connections and participating colleges. The UROP program will both foster professional student development and comprehensive faculty support.

Jahmal Williams, Director of Advocacy for Racial Justice

Jahmal Williams, Director of Advocacy for Racial Justice

This cross-departmental collaboration began in the Spring of 2020, when Jahmal Williams, Director of Advocacy for Racial Justice, brought forth the idea of institutionalizing such a program on campus. Williams, who participated in UROP as an undergraduate at the University of Michigan (the anchor model for SJSU), wanted to replicate and expand his experience with SJSU’s diverse student population. What initially began as a pilot project with limited scope, the program quickly expanded into a university-wide initiative with other community stakeholders. After a summer of intense planning, UROP launched its inaugural cohort this semester with 14 faculty and 13 students in the Colleges of Social Science, Humanities and Arts, Education, Health and Human Sciences, and Business, with plans to expand the program across campus in year two.

UROP is funded by the Office of Diversity Equity and Inclusion and housed in the Lurie College of Education, and coordinated by faculty in the College of Health and Human Sciences. For faculty and students interested in participating in the program, open enrollment will begin in the Spring 2022 semester. If you have any questions about the program or would like more information, please contact:

Andrew Carter             andrew.carter@sjsu.edu

Jahmal Williams         jahmal.williams@sjsu.edu

DEI Initiatives in CHHS

By: Dr. Michelle Hampton

The first CHHS DEI Needs Assessment was conducted between September and October of 2021. More than 190 students, faculty and staff participated in the survey or focus groups to share experiences and identify needs and priorities for action in the College. The results, as detailed in the full report, indicate that while many experience the College as diverse and inclusive, this experience is not universal. In order to promote a climate in which all of our community members can thrive, it is our goal to improve that experience for those who are underrepresented and  underserved through a variety of initiatives.

The Action Plan includes 7 goals (see CHHS Action Plan) based upon the needs, interests, and priorities identified in the Needs Assessment. The goal is to: build relationships and the structures to support actions that advance DEI in the College, evaluate their efficacy, and apply a cycle of continuous quality improvement going forward. The goals for the remainder of this academic year include:

  1. Institute DEI committees in CHHS departments (where they do not currently exist).
  2. Routinely schedule professional development opportunities and for individual consultation regarding DEI for faculty, staff, and students.
  3. Develop a sustainable resource for health professional advising for students.
  4. Routinely schedule development activities for underrepresented faculty mentorship.
  5. Integrate staff in department and College operations and increase access to professional development opportunities.
  6. Provide tools and establish channels for DEI-related communication.
  7. Create processes for data collection and ongoing evaluation of representation among students, faculty, staff, and administration in CHHS.

Committee to Enhance Equity and Diversity (CEED)CEED members will be sharing the results of the needs assessment within their departments in December and in Spring 2022, you can be on the alert for:

  • Inclusive teaching checklists, an effort led by Dr. David Daum, Assistant Professor, Department of Kinesiology and Dr. Denise Dawkins, Assistant Professor, The Valley Foundation School of Nursing and new CEED Committee Chair.
  • Student-focused sessions to share the needs assessment findings and continued data collection regarding student needs.
  • Early learning opportunities will include an introduction to Courageous Conversations About Race and discussion groups to apply teaching strategies in Cornell University’s free MOOC, Inclusive Teaching: Supporting All Students in the College Classroom.
  • There will also be opportunities for real-time problem-solving through CHHS DEI Office Hours. Anyone can register or sign up using the links below for the:

Finally, a RSCA Strategizing and Mentorship group for SJSU’s Black faculty will begin meeting monthly on January 26, 2022. For other faculty in need of this mentorship, Dr. Robin Whitney (TVFSON)  established a similar group (open to faculty who are not nurses too!), and has extended the invitation to  join this group for assistance with developing a plan for successfully achieving tenure and promotion. For more information or to join, contact michelle.hampton@sjsu.edu. The form for 1:1 appointments can also be used for general requests or suggestions.