The D’Arpino Essay Contest in Psychology

“Who am I?”  –  This deceptively simple question was the inspiration for this year’s D’Aripino Essay Contest.  In fact, Brook Hammond answered the question in the first sentence of her winning essay.  “Who am I? A daughter, a sister, a Photo: Brook Hammondfriend, a student, an athlete. Just a girl in a universe of billions.”  Of course, the subtle complexity of this question showed its face immediately with Brook’s second sentence.  “The real question is who I think I am.”  What followed was an honest and thought-provoking reflection on thoughts, opinions, beliefs, and experiences; the result of which comprise who Brook thinks she is at this moment in time.

This reflection on one’s self was exactly what Emilio (Chick) D’Arpino had in mind when he began funding these essay contests over a decade ago.  Chick is a retired bricklayer turned “explorer” who has been pursuing answers to deep questions through essay contests at San Jose State University and Stanford University since the late 1990s.

I knew I was in for fun the first time I met Chick.  With a smile as big as the day, a joke always chambered, and a handshake that lets you know he’s listening, Chick brightened my day immediately.  He explained that he is motivated to fund these contests because he is “profoundly aware that there is a correct answer to each question.”  Chick feels that these questions are applicable to everyone at a most personal level.  He wants to do what he can to support such reflection, and to affirm the unique human trait of self-identity.

As Chick left my office, I looked down at his “business card” and noticed his stated profession as “Senior Citizen.”  Another good chuckle before I turned back to the avalanche of emails slowly consuming my inbox.  While it may be true that he is a senior citizen according to AARP, I couldn’t help scratching out the phrase on his card and replacing it with, “Explorer.”

 

SJSU VITAL program reaches out to student vets

by Natalie Cabral
Spartan Daily, Nov 7, 2012
http://spartandaily.com/90412/sjsu-vital-program-reaches-out-to-student-vets

 

Arriving back in the United States after seven years of service in the U.S. Army was not an easy transition for global studies major Dustin Delzell.

“It was hard,” Delzell said, “It sucked and it still sucks. You leave a place where everybody thinks and acts like you do and then come here where nobody thinks or acts like you do.”

The grant program Veterans Integration to Academic Leadership (VITAL) initiative has been put into place on campus since early 2012 in order to help veterans such as Delzell successfully transition to college.

Damian Bramlett, the program’s veteran coordinator, said the purpose of the initiative is not only to provide a major source of veteran information regarding recent GI bills, but to assist with the unique struggles a veteran faces transitioning into the college atmosphere.

“These veterans need a climate where they’re not getting flack for being a veteran too,” Bramlett said.

The initiative, according to Bramlett, was a grant opportunity discovered last December that had already been successfully established at five colleges and universities in the U.S.

After submitting a proposal created by Annabel Prins, an associate professor of psychology, SJSU was one of 15 colleges and universities that was granted the funds to run the initiative, according to Bramlett.

“In March we began the foundations for the program,” he said, “That included every little thing from business cards and brochures which aren’t paid for with the grant money.”

According to Bramlett, the initiative’s grant only includes funding for his salary and a student assistant’s.

“We’ve used outside donors to help us out and that’s been great,” he said.

Since the program’s establishment on campus, Bramlett has worked to reach out to each and every veteran on campus through word of mouth, emails and advocacy.

“This initiative helps them with trying to finish their goal of finishing college,” Bramlett said.

The initiative allows him to provide information about physical and mental health counseling, financial help regarding the GI bill and housing assistance to all veterans on campus, according to Bramlett.

According to psychology professor Elena Klaw, the initiative helps create the type of community that can be a solution for veterans who feel a sense of isolation at SJSU.

In addition, Klaw also teaches a class through the Veterans Student Organization (VSO) titled Warriors at Home.

The course discusses issues relevant to veteran life such as post traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, depression, anxiety and healthy relationships, according to Klaw.

“It creates a community of veterans and mutual support,” Klaw said, “We know veterans are at a higher risk of things like suicide and violence in relationships, but social support is an important remedy.”

Mark Pinto, vice president of the Veterans Student Organization, served 20 years in the Marine Corps as a helicopter pilot and said veterans can use this initiative to gain a sense of visibility on campus.

“A lot of these young soldiers come back with traumas and issues,” Pinto said, “They feel isolated and they’ll find reasons to just drop out.”

Pinto said the importance of providing information to veterans about scholarships, work study, financial help and grants is crucial to feeling involved in the veteran community.

“Anything we can do to make people find a location to connect and reach out will create a sense of community,” Pinto said, “It’ll also bridge that gap of veterans and students.”

For Delzell, it is a gap that is all too real.

“We have different needs than a regular student,” he said. “The job title Damian holds is indispensable.”

An insider’s review of “Freud’s last session” at San Jose Repertory Theater

By Dr. Roger Karlsson

The San Jose Repertory Theater is currently playing “Freud’s last session” and I had the pleasure to be their consultant. Since I spent five years studying Freud at a psychoanalytic institute and I am a practicing psychoanalyst, I felt I would be the perfect person to illuminate Sigmund Freud’s personal history as well as psychoanalysis.  Little did I know! Instead of lecturing for a group of novices I found myself involved in a scholarly dialogue with a group of people who had researched the subject thoroughly. I guess I shouldn’t have been surprised; after theater professionals are known for preparing well.  For example, J. Michael Flynn, who plays the role of Freud, told me he started to prepare for this role last summer and the director, Stephen Wrentmore, was like a walking encyclopedia about Freud and had read several of his books as inspiration when directing the actors!

I also had the chance to read Mark St. Germain’s script of the play and I was again amazed! Although the meeting between Freud and C.S. Lewis probably never actually occurred, I found the script masterfully weaving together factually correct biographical information about Freud and Freud’s version of psychoanalysis in a dialogue that discusses the eternal questions about the human condition: why do we live, why do we die, how can we live with our personal emotional wounds, is there a God, and if so, why isn’t God doing something about our personal suffering and the global suffering in the world?  In fact, I only found one slight error in the script, which I am sure St. Germain did on purpose for some dramatic effect.

Watching the play is an absolute delight.  J. Michael Flynn is depicting Freud not only with the iconic grey beard and cigar, but even manages to incorporate Freud’s speech pattern, gestures, and postures.  In the play, we meet Freud only three weeks before he ended his life through euthanasia.  He was a man marked by his sixteen-year struggle with mouth cancer, in constant pain, but refusing to take analgesics since he was afraid it would prevent him from continuing work on his theory.  In fact, Freud died in the midst of writing one of his most important papers, where he discusses how the self, as a consequence of trauma, can as a defensive measure split into experiencing several versions of reality, each one carrying parts of the “truth” but distorted by how we wished things would have unfolded.  Freud knows he is dying soon but instead of lying down and waiting for the end he can’t stop seeking the truth of the human condition and engages the deeply religious Lewis in a fiery battle of reason.  On stage, you can witness Freud and Lewis vacillating between despair, intense pain, bitterness, sarcastic humor, and joy, but never giving up on trying understanding each other despite their fundamental differences in how to relate to life.  In the end these two intellectual giants depart without anyone winning or a losing the debate, but that is not the point, instead through the meeting of the minds both men are different when they say goodbye.  After their epic battle of reason, Lewis’ mindset is now a part of Freud and Freud’s mindset is now a part of Lewis – how psychoanalytic is that!  Wouldn’t we all wish we had “enemies” that challenged our world view and were willing to engage in a dialogue that forced us to think and think again?

I was very pleased to see a balanced view of Freud on stage, without idealizing him or smearing him. For example, the play isn’t hiding the fact the Freud’s daughter, Anna Freud, went in analysis with him, which we today would find to be highly questionable from an ethical point of view, but on the other hand, it also clearly explains that Freud’s definition of sexuality is substantially broader and different from today’s definition of “sex.” Indeed, the play shows masterfully that although Freud died, he is not dead and is still worth reckoning with.  I recommend all psychology folk spend an inspirational evening at the theater enjoying this play before it too soon moves to Tucson, Arizona!

Learn more about the play at http://www.sjrep.com/

 

Human-Robot Interactions 2012

HRI 2012 logoDrs Donald Kalar and Collin Green, faculty in Psychology at SJSU and researchers at NASA Ames Research Center, presented their research, “Understanding Situational Awareness in Multi-Unit Supervisory Control Through Data-Mining and Modeling with Real-Time Strategy Games” at the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interactions (HRI).   HRI is a highly selective conference that aims to showcase the very best interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research in human-robot interaction with roots in robotics, social psychology, cognitive science, HCI, human factors, artificial intelligence, engineering, and many more.  Learn more at http://hri2012.org/.  Learn more about our Department’s partnership with NASA Ames and the Human Systems Integration Division by visiting http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/.

 

Kevin Jordan Receives $73.3 Million Award to Participate in NASA Research

SAN JOSE, Calif., — The NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif., has selected San Jose State University Research Foundation for a five-year, $73.3 million cooperative agreement to participate in the development of systems for improving the safety and efficiency of air and space travel. NASA scientists, along with SJSU faculty members and graduate students, will collaborate on this effort, funded by the largest federal award in SJSU history. The principal investigator will be Professor of Psychology and of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Kevin Jordan.  Read the full story here.

image: Jordan and colleagues in 777 simulator